125
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Authors demand credit and compensation from AI companies using their work without permission | OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta have been called out::The letter, published by professional writers' organization The Authors Guild, is addressed to the bosses of OpenAI, Alphabet, Meta, Stability AI, IBM, and Microsoft. It calls out...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kromem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cost of the book + maybe a civil penalty?

Does no one remember the days of Napster and the multiples over retail cost that people caught pirating were charged?

And technically piracy is a federal crime, so there could even be criminal charges.

A "nothing burger"?

Let's see...oh my, what's this? 504.c.2

In a case where the copyright owner sustains the burden of proving, and the court finds, that infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum of not more than $150,000.

That's per work infringed.

Nothing burger indeed.

OpenAI is on the other end of over two decades of fearmongering and lobbying to enact laws with ridiculous penalties for piracy in the digital age.

As for how we know where they got the information, that's what subpoenas are for in a legal proceeding. Even if training information is not publicly disclosed, whether they did or didn't pirate content is going to come out privately in court.

The AI doesn't need to reproduce the book for OpenAI to have infringed in illegally sourcing the copyrightable material they used in training.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 1 year ago

You failed to read my post. You jumped straight into an assumption that piracy can be proved rather than actually reading what I've posted.

If you're going to continue with strawman arguments then please return to reddit.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Piracy can be proved if it occurred by talking to employees under oath and subpoenaing relevant email records.

The idea the court would need to reverse engineer ChatGPT to find out is absurd.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
125 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
3508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS