513
submitted 1 year ago by salarua@sopuli.xyz to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Most property owners ie had a plot of land could not afford a slave... they worked that land themselves and then forced their 6 kids do it for them.

[-] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Sick part you “borrow slaves from what was called New York stock exchange. Then sell a slave or get collateral.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah going down that rabbit whole really does expose how "white washed" even current understanding of slavery by the normie stream is... shit was whole different level vile that teevee won't really cover.

[-] TerryMathews@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Right, but take the converse: if they didn't own land, they definitely couldn't afford a slave.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

also true... wiki will explain it better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

owning a plantation is necessary to be a slaver but it is not sufficient since you actually have to own the slaves.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
513 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7125 readers
571 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS