162
submitted 9 months ago by mp3@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] admiralteal@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago

And how do you know that is the experience, here? When most medical experts say clearly they have no idea whether this is peaceful or torture, how are you so confident it is the former?

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

According to the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, in humans, "breathing an oxygen deficient atmosphere can have serious and immediate effects, including unconsciousness after only one or two breaths. The exposed person has no warning and cannot sense that the oxygen level is too low." In the US, at least 80 people died from accidental nitrogen asphyxiation between 1992 and 2002. Hazards with inert gases and the risks of asphyxiation are well-established.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inert_gas_asphyxiation

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It would be a bit less terrible a method if it actually worked that way. Still depraved, but slightly less.

But it doesn't. Took 30 minutes for the guy to die, supposedly.

Vets swore off using this technique a while ago because of how clearly-distressed animals were when it was performed on them.

There's a big difference between the kind of freak industrial accident you're describing and intentional administration via a mask. And either way, we literally do not know if it is peace or torture.

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I'll agree that dying against your will is torture. And for animals that have time to know something is wrong and can't escape it, they're going to be distressed. I'm curious about the discrepancy between why this reportedly took so long when work safety experts warn that a couple of breaths of an oxygen deficient atmosphere can induce unconsciousness.

But I'm only answering the question of why we would think this is painless and then assertion that we can't know. It sure sounds like we do know. But I'll stay open minded and keep reading.

[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

The article said that the guy held his breath for as long as possible. It really would be torture to be strapped down and know that the next breath you take will kill you. Even if the actual experience is completely painless, trying to hold your breath as long as you can in order to stay alive for just a few more seconds sounds like a nightmare.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

That's horrifying. Holding your breath until you think holding it any longer will kill you because not doing so definitely will. At least with the injection there was absolutely nothing you could do to delay or stop the process once it started.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Well, apparently there was.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Why the fuck wouldn't they sedate the guy first - give him a fucking fentanyl OD and immediately put the mask on him.

[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure. Maybe there's a law or something that says a person needs to be conscious and aware when they get executed?

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean, the citation is, to start with, not a medical organization. They're reporting on workplace incidents, essentially, and making big assumptions. Also no mentioned of the violent seizures.

Also, not to be captain obvious, but reports of the experience, definitionally, come from people who survived, which is another layer of it being a vastly different experience than dying that may not even be terribly analogous. Surviving it might mean a biologically different process happened to you than not surviving it.

There's a huge difference between an industrial accident and an execution. One of them is being done on purpose. An industrial accident may be someone running into a room flooded by the N2 fire suppression system, expecting nothing was wrong, taking a few deep breaths, and suddenly blacking out. Sudden, unexpected, unprepared, confused. The prisoner knows its coming, it's being administered on a schedule, and might not be too keen on the whole thing. The guy in this case, for example, was strapped down to a gurney and had the mask tied to his head, allegedly. Not being surprised means it is a lot less likely to work in that sudden, shocking way even all-else being equal, which it isn't.

Again, the medical experts I've seen interviewed all shrug at the question. They do not know. And even if knowing its coming isn't an issue, the best evidence of using it for deliberate execution we have was the great distress it apparently caused animals.

[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It took 30 minutes for them to declare him dead. Only a few minutes for his breathing to stop entirely. I don't think they had them hooked up to an EEG, so they just left him on the nitrogen for long enough to make sure it would be effective and then declared him dead.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
162 points (95.5% liked)

News

23268 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS