World News

2698 readers

95 users here now

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml

sovietsnake@lemmygrad.ml

ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml

Iran has told the US via intermediaries that if it strikes Iranian soil directly, Tehran will itself hit back at American assets in the Middle East, drawing the two sides into a direct conflict. (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fire86743@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Iran should have kept the nukes...

[–] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Let's hope they did.

Israel gets to play the pretend game, after all. Why shouldn't Iran?

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Flaunting it openly like DPRK is pretty stylish too ngl

[–] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did they have confirmed nukes at any point? I thought they agreed to stop their nuclear program at energy production only.

[–] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

No. They never had nuclear weapons. They’d have to do tests which you can detect with seismographs and which can be confirmed with testing of air for particles on the borders of the country.

Additionally Isn’treal would have acted differently. Either suing for peace or forcing the US to join it in an attack.

Additionally one of the top Islamic authorities there opined nuclear weapons were un-Islamic.