29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)
Arch Linux
7175 readers
2 users here now
The beloved lightweight distro
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I use booster and it's cool. I don't see any noticeable difference in boot times but the image generation is much faster. mkinitcpio would take several seconds while booster takes about one.
First time I tried it it didn't boot because of something missing in the generated image. I tried a universal booster image (set
universal: True
in/etc/booster.yaml
) and it worked. Technically this builds a larger image than necessary but it's still only 34MB and takes a second to build, so I never bothered to troubleshoot what was missing. The universal image even handles luks encrypted root partitions without additional configuration of booster (you still have to configure kernel parameters).Another issue I noticed is that if you use
grub-mkconfig
and your only initramfs is booster, it will generate an incorrect main boot entry. It will add booster as an option in "advanced options" so your system is still bootable if this happens to you. The quick fix is to manually add theinitrd
entry under the main menuentry ingrub.cfg
.mkinitcpio takes around 2-3 minites to run on my machine, booster should be faster right?
What's your machine?
some old crappy asus laptop from 2012-2014 with no hyperthreading, slow ddr3 ram, dead gpu and a mechanical hard drive
Thank you!