149
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

For those who missed the megapost on the New Hampshire Primary...

Nevada is holding it's primary on Tuesday, 2/6, but is also holding a Republican Caucus on 2/8.

Nikki Haley is running in the Primary, but not the Caucus.

Trump is running in the Caucus, but not the Primary.

But here's the thing... The Primary is COMPLETELY pointless. No delegates will be assigned based on primary results.

ONLY THE CAUCUS COUNTS.

So Trump has, in effect, already won Nevada, which is why Haley is focused on her home state of South Carolina which is the next one that counts.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

Why does she do it like that?

Is it to spare her a big defeat in Nevada if she went head to head with Trump?
Or what would be the reason to just give up on the chance of getting at least some delegates?

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

So I'm speculating heavily here.

You can only run in either the primary or the caucus (per Nevada GOP rules, only true this year, who knows in 4 years).

At the time Haley had to decide which one she was running in, the list of who was running was still pretty long. You figure you probably can't beat Trump, best you can do is second. However if you jump into the primary and win (in a crowded list) you can say "The people of Nevada have spoken" and use that to gain some momentum. Yes, you win against not-Trump, but you still win. You've got real voting numbers showing that people will vote for you.

The problem is that Nevada has a caucus with only Trump and a primary with only Haley. (And maybe some randos?). That's not exciting for anyone, so we basically just skip it.

Yes, you don't get delegates this way, but you can pick up enough delegates other places. In a world where Trump is unavailable and it's a Desantis v Haley Nevada show down, then this would have been a really stupid decision by Haley. As it actually happened... It's fine. Nevada is a waste and we move on.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
149 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS