180
submitted 9 months ago by vis4valentine@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A few days ago I shared some news that the Eurovision song from Israel would be named "Your land is mine now" to later realize it was from an onion kind of website, lol.

I hope I'm not alone in this kind of f'up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 0 points 9 months ago

If the ICJ stated genocide is likely happening, those quotes exist and would be used by you to bolster their case.

I think.you are essentially just makinf your argument on the vibe of your reading of the international.courts, and not what is documented. Am i correct?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I got bored: https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations

That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I think you are refusing to do any research on something you aren't willing to change your mind about. I think nothing would change your mind, so you didn't even bother watching any of the three parts of the hearing because you already knew what you would believe.

Your method of doing that is to never state a clear opinion, not engage in any logic, and respond to everything with questions.

I'll follow suit. What do you think the purpose of that hearing was, and what do you think the conclusion was for the hearing?

But, as per my previous paragraph, I'd bet you didn't even watch it.

[-] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 0 points 9 months ago

I'm sorry you don't like the fact that I'm asking you questions regarding your claims instead of just arguing at you or outright accepting them without question. I imagine I can be frustrating when you are wanting one of those two options and I won't provide it.

But you are bringing forth accusations, millenia old accusations, and they should be examined.

As for what I think the conclusion of the hearings was, we have not concluded the proceedings whatsoever and anybody claiming determinations have been released is being dishonest.

I'm giving you every opportunity to discuss this without hyperbolism.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Last week the first children (cause children always die first from starvation) died from starvation.

Say it with me: Israel is committing genocide you bigoted fuck.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I got bored. https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won't read it, but you should.

You should also really watch South Africa's presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

We do know the conclusion to the prelimenary hearing to determine if Israel is plausibly committing genocide, which is what has happened so far. Pretending that that hasn't happened is just bad faith arguing from a bigot.

Have fun justifying people starving to death with bellies full of grass caused by a government found by the ICJ to plausibly be committing genocide.

But you are bringing forth accusations, millenia old accusations, and they should be examined.

They have been. You're ignoring anything that gives an answer you don't like, and accusing the people who have paid attention of being antisemites, cheapening the word for actual antisemitism.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
180 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43791 readers
943 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS