25
How Albanese could tweak negative gearing to save money and build more new homes
(theconversation.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
Negative gearing will never be removed.
It's nothing to do with the voters.The politicians are the landlords
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/politicians-and-their-property-portfolios-how-many-do-they-own/wb7k9xq1p
We literally just had politicians vote against their own self interest by reducing stage 3 tax cuts.
It’s possible they will do the same for negative gearing.
Politicians didn't need the tax cuts.
They already gave themselves a 4% pay rise, their biggest increase in a decade
Aren't their wage increases determined by an independent group/board ?
And the President of that is a former CEO of Australia’s largest commercial property services firm, and former National President of the Property Council of Australia.
C'mon, you know how this works
Ayup. Get them scared enough and self preservation will override the greed