1383
Crunchyroll
(lemy.lol)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1383 points (98.1% liked)
People Twitter
5263 readers
1557 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Doubtful. TOS would state that you're only licensing the media. If the media no longer exists, the license no longer exists.
Day 10,490 of saying it should be flatly illegal to call a lease a purchase. Companies should never be allowed to use language that implies ownership of a product when what you're buying is a permanently revokable temporary lease.
"But it's in the TOS, what they're doing is perfectly legal" yeah the problem is that it's legal
Fraud is still fraud, even if they call it something else.
The consumer was led to believe, they could access the media for a long time. The time was abruptly cut short. The consumer did not get what they were led to believe. It's fraud.
It's like every other (consumer-)fraud before: they can write in the fine print whatever they want.
I am not saying that this argument will definitely hold up in court. I just want to point out, that it's not so clear-cut as you are presenting it.
TOS is meaningless when the actions are illegal.
I didn't give a signature on any ToS I've ever agreed to. It's entirely unenforceable.