116
submitted 9 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago

If this was a progressive weight charge, I'd be all for it. For example if you are 2x the mean weight for an adult, then you pay 4x the cost, whereas if you are 2 standard deviations lighter you'd only pay 1/4th the cost I'd be all for it. But that isn't what they are planning on doing with this. It's just a way to charge more for worse service.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

then they get 4x the space on the plane, right?

[-] doctorcherry@feddit.uk 9 points 9 months ago

The majority of costs to the airline are in taxes, airport fees, and lease costs of the plane. I think you’ll be surprised to find out that fuel consumption is a very minor part of the ticket cost. You must also consider that the increased fuel consumption of +50kg of extra cargo to a system that is 100+ tons to begin with is going to be a bit negligible.

Sure you could have a progressive weight charge. But it’s gonna be more like $1 for someone who is twice your weight. Not twice the ticket price.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
116 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32317 readers
752 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS