this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
526 points (97.3% liked)

The Onion

6515 readers
734 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 520@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Goes a bit beyond that nowadays. Deep fakes can be used to create false evidence for example

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Deepfakes are already being used on an industrial scale for scams and conning people.

It's not a case of them needing regulating because they offend peoples sensibilities, it's because they're actively being used to harm people.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

how would more regulation help? what you are talking about is already illegal

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same way cracking down on CP helps make it harder to access by pedos.

Y'all are seriously looking creepy

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Good one. You want to lock people up but people who believe in the first amendment are creepy. Nice spoof of moral panic populism.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not everyone is an American idiot

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

True. Freedom of speech and of the press is a peculiarly American thing. In virtually all other countries... No, wait. That's the 2nd amendment. What were we talking about?

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Good one. You want the freedom to create any porn you want regardless of who it hurts without any personal accountability.

This is a weird hill to die on but I've seen worse. Not really.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don't have to be a Hugh Hefner to reject fascism.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

Putting in safeguards to protect people from porn being made of them is fascism?

Like I said. Weird hill.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, fraud used to be such a fun pastime for the whole family. Now we need to regulate it. Technology ruins everything.

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The past month or so I've started encountering quite a few deepfakes on dating sites. I honestly can't tell they're deepfakes just by looking; the only reason I've realised tell is because they were very obviously Instagram model photos. I reverse image searched them to find where they were taken from and confirm my suspicions that the profile's using stolen photos, only to find that the original photos aren't quite the same. It'll be the exact same shot with the same body but a different face, and with identifying tattoos removed, moles adds, etc.

If they weren't obvious modelling shots that made me want to reverse image search them, I wouldn't have known at all. It makes me wonder how many deepfaked images I've encountered on dating sites already and just not known about because they've been fairly innocuous-looking photos...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] 520@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In a courtroom sure. What about putting it on YouTube?

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you have no issues with me distributing deepfakes of you burning crosses across your neighborhood?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not saying deepfakes should not be regulated.

I'm saying the examples are poor because scamming people is already illegal.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you aren't actually syaing anything at all. You're just being contrarian for the sake of it.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Not exactly. Arguments like "they should be regulated because they can be used for illegal stuff" are moot, since those usages are already regulated. I'm on the fence on the whole regulation thing and I've yet to see any actual realistic examples on how regulation would look.

Is it even logical to regulate ai images specifically, or should we lump it in together with any form of image manipulation?