424
submitted 9 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

The state's highest court reversed a judge's dismissal of the case involving embryos destroyed by a wandering Mobile hospital patient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Lol.nope. Militias aren't going to stand a a chance against the federal government and if we got invaded the military would be begging people to stop getting in the way of the world's most efficient killing machine.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

There's more to war than war.

[-] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Yes, such as war.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

You're assuming a lot there. All else being equal making a super militia is not going to swing things.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Think of it more like a union. And armed forces arent necessarily the best vehicle for political change for obvious reasons, but rather they are good for protecting human rights from institutions that want to take them away. For instance, a pro choice militia that would protect a clinic, doctor, or patient from a state agency trying to arrest them and prosecute them. Also, it doesn't need to end up in a shootout, a lot of military and defense is about hypothesis of conflict and the potential cost that comes with it. Sure, a federal or government institution could wipe the floor with the militia, but would it be worth it monetarily and politically?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In the case you highlight? Absolutely. Christian fascists see violence against the oppressed group as a good thing.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 9 months ago

I love this argument, because in reality the U.S. government hasn't won a military victory against an entrenched militia since Grenada. And that was just a tiny island. We couldn't beat the taliban, who were armed with a bunch of cold war surplus gear.

Even if the U.S. military and police forces wanted to fight a civil war against their own population, they would have to do so knowing that the American public has 100 guns for every soldier and cop.

Tanks, planes, and drones can't do much without soldiers on the ground to enforce an occupation.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I see you've fallen for the propaganda. The Taliban only came back after we left. And only because they had enough support from the people. AQ and ISIS are shattered. Al-Shabab is basically the FARC of East Africa now.

I know you guys think you have some kind of "silent majority" but you really don't. Given a choice between normalcy and living in an insurgency, most people will choose normalcy in a heart beat. So it won't be the military vs the people. It will be the militias vs the people and their military. At best you'll get sizeable chunks of some red state populations. Just imagine how thrilled the other 90% of the country is going to be that you chose violence. Yeah, they're going to cheer videos of Apache gun cam footage on live TV. And you'll still be clueless.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
424 points (98.8% liked)

News

23361 readers
3496 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS