208

Seriously, why is the USA supporting Israel? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

173 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The US is supporting Israel through what we can mostly all agree is a genocide of the Gazans. Clearly, Biden isn't a genocidal maniac, yet he's all in with unwavering support. Why are we doing this? There has to be a logical reason that isn't just "we want Israel to kill everyone in Gaza and take their land a la lebensraum."

We know this is an emotional topic, so please be respectful of each other so that we can have open and clear authentic discussion on the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 9 months ago

Jews are not a uniform voting bloc, divided on many issues, Israel being one of them.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In the 1980s through the aughts, it was a lot easier to turn a blind eye to the inhumane treatment of Palestinians because media agencies controlled the narrative. Once the internet allowed for unvetted video to leak the pubic have a better grasp on what is actually going on.

In other controversies, the ubiquity if phone cameras plays a significant part, but I don't know how many phone cameras are in Palestine.

I think it is this, how the internet affects narratives of violence against oppressed peoples, that drives the save the kids from the internet policies like KOSA and SESTA/FOSTA. The US federal government doesn't really care about children, but it does care about leaks that embarrass the administration or the state.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think this is a good observation, though I'm not exactly sure how it applies to my comment, unless you're trying to imply that people as a whole, Jews included, are more divided on Israel today than in the 80's because they have better access to information from more varied perspectives.

I'd say that sounds true.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Never said that they were, but I imagine theres a notable percentage who would be very single issue on the subject.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024

208 points (80.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26980 readers

1265 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.