38
Can anyone explain why this is a brilliant move?
(aussie.zone)
# | Player | Country | Elo |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Magnus Carlsen | ๐ณ๐ด | 2839 |
2 | Fabiano Caruana | ๐บ๐ธ | 2786 |
3 | Hikaru Nakamura | ๐บ๐ธ | 2780 |
4 | Ding Liren ๐ | ๐จ๐ณ | 2780 |
5 | Alireza Firouzja | ๐ซ๐ท | 2777 |
6 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | ๐ท๐บ | 2771 |
7 | Anish Giri | ๐ณ๐ฑ | 2760 |
8 | Gukesh D | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2758 |
9 | Viswanathan Anand | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2754 |
10 | Wesley So | ๐บ๐ธ | 2753 |
September 4 - September 22
ITT: Wrong
Unless I've missed something big you are correct; it wins the pawn which is nice, but it's hardly earth shattering as long as black doesn't have a brain fart and take the bishop. According to a quick look with Stockfish:
You can try yourself; go to lichess and click the little live-analysis toggle on the left side up above the move list. Stockfish isn't perfect but it's better than any of us here.
Yeah, Stockfish doesn't consider it a brilliant move at all. Evaluation swings from +2.6 to +1.6.
Instead of Bb5, SF recommends grabbing the center with d4 or castling.
Interesting. So was the screenshot that showed up in my feed faked, then?