7
from the COPA v. Craig Wright case. If you are good with computor you will delight in the list of reasons supporting the allegation that Wright's documents are forged. (PDF) (www.opencrypto.org)
submitted 8 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/buttcoin@awful.systems
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] self@awful.systems 4 points 8 months ago

DCG objects to the sale — that is, to the actions of its own subsidiary! DCG argued to Judge Sean Lane that the “sheer quantity of the Trust Assets at issue will pose a serious risk of value destruction.” LOL.

I realize this is all a clown show, but how is it possible for a subsidiary to defy their parent company like this? I figured in cases like this, the people calling the shots at the subsidiary generally get fired and replaced with folks willing to play ball

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 8 months ago

ch 11 bankruptcy is special. even if the same team is still running things, they're highly restricted in what they can do. also, equity holders are generally presumed to go to 0 and can go whistle.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Buttcoin

385 readers
8 users here now

Buttcoin is the future of online butts. Buttcoin is a peer-to-peer butt. Peer-to-peer means that no central authority issues new butts or tracks butts.

A community for hurling ordure at cryptocurrency/blockchain dweebs of all sorts. We are only here for debate as long as it amuses us. Meme stocks are also on topic.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems