459
Microsoft and Google may have to surrender people's data to Saudi Arabia after signing huge deals there
(www.businessinsider.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
459 points (96.9% liked)
Technology
59242 readers
2540 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I appreciate your input and perspective. However, I respectfully disagree with your characterization of Saudi Arabia's investment in tech companies such as Google and Microsoft as solely focused on enriching a select few elites while ignoring the needs and concerns of marginalized communities within the country.
While it is true that Saudi Arabia has faced challenges when it comes to upholding human rights and promoting inclusive economic growth, there have been efforts made by the government to address these issues head-on. For example, the recent lifting of the driving ban for women, along with other reforms aimed at increasing women's participation in the workforce, are steps towards greater social and economic equality.
As for the specific deals between tech companies and Saudi Arabia, I would argue that they are not simply about enriching a select few individuals or corporations, but rather about fostering innovation and technological advancement that can benefit all citizens. The investments made into tech giants like Google and Microsoft are part of a larger push to modernize Saudi Arabia's economy and improve access to information and communication technology for all individuals and communities within the Kingdom.
In addition, I would note that your suggestion to "fuck them" is not only inflammatory but also misses the mark in terms of how these investments can positively impact Saudi Arabia's broader social and economic development goals. While there may be legitimate concerns and criticisms to raise regarding Saudi Arabia's human rights record, I believe that it is important to recognize the complexities of the situation and work towards constructive solutions rather than dismissing the country outright.
Ultimately, I hope we can engage in thoughtful dialogue and critique while also recognizing the potential positive impacts of these investments and efforts towards greater social and economic progress. Thank you for contributing to the conversation.
Regarding your first paragraph, I think that's exactly what's happening here. Companies don't make decisions for the benefit of the populations that consume their product - public companies make decisions to benefit their share holders. Dictators don't make decisions for the benefit of their oppressed citizens - they make decisions to benefit the small number of people that keep them in power and aid in their reign. So a dictatorship making large value deals with a company seems reaaallyy unlikely to lead to any net positive for any of the relevant populations.
Additionally, your phrasing here sounds like you're writing for an AP exam - Saudi Arabia hasn't 'faced challenges' with upholding human rights and more than the Unabomber 'faced challenges' with not killing people with explosives. The nation has consistently and repeatedly (and continues to) flagrantly violate the most basic tenants of human rights and has yet to be held accountable owing entirely to their vast wealth and geopolitical control of the world's primary energy source.
One can not reasonably argue in good faith that making a nation with a long history of intentional human rights violations, slavery, political and apolitical assassinations, etc - will suddenly (or gradually) improve by acquiring more of the same wealth that has historically enabled them to commit these acts.
There are no nuances or complexities that justify these actions and no tangible benefits associated with 'a thoughtful dialogue and critique'. Any further communication here just gives you more of a platform to shill for your employers.
So yep, 'fuck them' and probably you.
Overall, while there may be legitimate concerns about certain aspects of Saudi Arabia's governance, it is clear that the country remains an important partner for the United States on a range of issues. By highlighting these factors, we can help to dispel any misconceptions or negative stereotypes about the country and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between the two nations. For you to question such a dear ally, you must certainly be employed by Israeli interests because Israel does not have any true allies except for the USA itself. As an American, I think it's important to acknowledge our longstanding partnership with Saudi Arabia and the importance of this relationship in maintaining regional stability.
I have plenty of problems with Israel, including their interactions with Palestine, and am definitely not employed by them either. They have more than their own fair share of atrocities - but those atrocities do not in any way detract from the fact that KSA is a dictatorship that the US props up to maintain its interest in that region. Still 'fuck them'. Done engaging here.