458

https://xkcd.com/2908

Alt text:

Astronomers are a little unsure of the applicability of this index, but NASA's Planetary Protection Officer is all in favor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] topherclay@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I think part of it is that Mt Everest is a lot smaller than you'd think when you're looking at this scale. The moon is only 2% of the Earths volume so when you spread it over the Earths surface it's really like a thin thin film to cover the whole surface. But the truth is that all of human experience is an even thinner film smeared across the surface.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

How is 43 km of moon armor a thin surface by any means?

[-] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

Consider that the earth is ~12700 km in diameter

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, but from surface to space it's ruthly 100 km, so 43 km is quite the cover. Then again, I get what you are saying. I gues it's a matter of perspective.

[-] mcmoor@bookwormstory.social 1 points 8 months ago

Ah I see. Although the comic spreads the moon "relatively", it presents it absolutely. Although interesting in by itself it does feels it's missing something.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
458 points (98.3% liked)

xkcd

8836 readers
186 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS