[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

No worries. I heard it a more common problem then one would think.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If 21 % can't read (are Illiterate) then it makes sense that 79 % can read (are literate). So yes, nationwide and in the US are the same thing.

Besides that, I agree. No sources is a no go and no moderated comments is a fucking biohazard.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Okay, I'll not downvotes but try to engage.

The right I activly holding back information from their echo chamber that can objectively view as factual (climate change is the most prominent example that comes to mind). So they are indeed ignoring reality in a messuarable way. Why do you think the right is not perseved as a thread then? For example the thread of ignoring climate change or science in general? Do you think "the middle" doesn't see that as a problem?

How, in your option has the left removed itself from reality? Can you provide some concrete examples please?

I can think of examples for the silencing both on the right or the left. In regards to the left I'm thinking of speakers at university's beeing canceled or yelled over. And I do see how speach controll might be seen as silencing. Is it a thing? Where I am from it seems to be more of a right wing point pretending that they are speach-controlled while nobody is forcing speech on anybody, just suggesting more inclusive ways of speaking (let's use pronouns as an example).

So I guess what I am saying is: Is the perception of the left grounded in reality or has it been crafted by right wing propaganda? And since the answer has to be "yes to both", do you think it's more grounded in reality than it is constructed by the right?

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

From this response and the others given here I think you should have better said "... this is MY roleplaying game". I don't think I would enjoy this attitude as a player.

That beeing said, you do yours. As long as you are having fun and you have players that enjoy your style of DMing, that's all fine.

Not everybodies playstyle is compatible, and that is a good thing, because different people enjoy different things. I'm saying this because I want to make clear that I'm not trying to make a personal attack here.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

This isn't a physics sim. This is a roleplaying game.

😉

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

That's a very low bar.

I'll show myfself out.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

Du vergisst dabei meiner Meinung nach, dass die Konkurrenz im diesem Fall breiter gefächert war.

12
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Gloomy@mander.xyz to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Mich würde interessieren, was eure Gedanken hierzu sind. Ich kann mir vorstellen, dass die CDU das in den nächsten Wochen im Wahlkampf intensiv nutzen wird.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also true if Eddy from Steven King's Dark Tower was Australien

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Ich finde das eine ist nicht abhängig vom anderen. Ich finde es fair, wen die oberen 20 % mehr Steuer zahlen als die unteren 80%.

Beim Rest stimme ich dir zu, Vermögenssteuer, Erbschaftssteuer und Kapitalertragssteuer waren sinnvolle Maßnahmen.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

65000 Euro Brutto im Jahr sind ca. 39.369,60 Euro Netto in Steuerklasse 1

39.369.60 € : 12 = 3280.79 €

Mit 65.000 liegt man schon ziemlich im oberen Bereich.

Mit 85.000 im Jahr:

Und da du doppelt so hoch (130.000 im Jahr) Vorschlägst:

Quelle:

https://www.iwkoeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/HTML/2022/Einkommensrechner/index.html

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Come to Lemmy, where the left can still be found in all its unhinged glory. We have Eat-the-Rich-Mondays, Threaten-a-Tankie-Thursdays and Wine-about-Windows-Wednesdays.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 81 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No, not true. They are saying that this time they knew to watch close, so the Democrats couldn't pull of the same fraud as 2020. They are indeed stating that it is "supisious" that 13 Million Democratic voices where nowhere to be seen this time around, taking that as proof they were right all along.

That's how this works. You take reality and then make it mean what you want it to mean. So that's their take in regards to voter fraud.

43

As title says :-)

9
submitted 1 year ago by Gloomy@mander.xyz to c/green@lemmy.ml

This is a (slightly older) article about Nuclear Energy and climate change. It's a hottly debated topic in climate communities, so I thought some of you would enjoy to read it.

Another article that brings up some more points against nuclear power can be found here.

I'd be interested what you ppl think of the matter.

view more: next ›

Gloomy

joined 1 year ago