512
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
512 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19144 readers
2501 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Maybe he should try “not committing crimes”.
It's more than just not commiting crimes. These are civil judgements, after all, and technically not criminal matters. But at their heart, we will find lots and lots of lying. Lying about his interaction with Carroll, lying about the values of his properties, all very public lies. Lying to the point where, when his lies are exposed, he keeps lying. His dishonesty has no limits.
It amazes me that people admire that.
It's a Catch -22. He's rich, therefore he must be smart. The people who vote for him think it's their fault they haven't got money. They love him because he acts the way they would if they were rich.
I like to read old comics. Pretty much every Superman cover from the 1950s shows Supes doing something that looks stupid or evil. "Why Is Superman Throwing Lois Into a Volcano?" And of course there's always a great reason, because Superman can never be a bad guy.
I actually wrote a thesis on that, the turning point for Superman covers was more in the late 60s, around the time of the Tet Offensive in '68.
Pre-1968 Superman covers:
(1965)
(1966)
Post-1968 Superman covers:
(1969)
(1970)
I'd like to know more...
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.WyaafP9C5Ahx88R2bX6NRgHaEK?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain
Yeah you haven't actually said anything here, like if anything post-68 Superman seems more of an asshole here.
That's the point, it turned post '68.
Yeah, but the comment you replied to said he was an asshole pre-68.
Edit: Oh okay, they said from 1950 on, you said the change was 1968 - he was an asshole after then. You were just saying it happened later, I thought it was maybe the other way around or something.
But why?
It's a good question, we'd need to talk to someone involved with DC editorial from back then.
But taking a primary symbol of America and portraying him in a negative light just after the Vietnam war turned really ugly sure seems to have been intentional.
It's important to note that the CONTENT of the book never really changed, just the covers.
You said you wrote a thesis, so I figured you had a theory.
Well, that's pretty much the theory. I don't have the paper anymore it was 32 years ago now...
So you gonna leave us hanging? Why did Superman throw Lois into a volcano?!
A] Alien shapeshifter revealed when they transform to escape
B] Robot duplicate
C] Only way to reverse a magic spell
D] She was pegging Perry White and that shit will not stand.
E] All of the above
He never could get the hang of Thursdays 🤷
I'm loving this new crossover. His cape would have to be made of terry cloth
Sass that hoopy Clark Kent! There's a frood who knows where his towel is!
"I caught Clark Kent listening to Vogon poetry and he didn't even have a minor aneurysm! I think he might be invulnerable."
It really is wild to me how people equate wealth with intelligence. So many people think the biggest dumbasses in the world are literal geniuses just because they got tons of money lol it's crazy.
People don't admire the fact he's a liar.
They admire him because he's a racist, homophobe, and transphobe.
They admire him because he says things they wish they could say without getting yelled at by liberals.
They are okay if he's a liar, sexist, misogynist asshole so long as he's also racist, homophobic, and transphobic.
The misogyny and sexism unfortunately are also on the other side of that, for more than half the people who follow him. Since some of the women are also conditioned to see that as a good thing. And most of the men, of course.
Don't forget that he also promised them all their wildest dreams if they only bow down and worship him.
"Man does not live on bread alone."
"Scoff. Socialist."
And a bunch of poor people paying his and his billionaire friends bills for them.
Hey now…let’s not get too crazy with these ideas!
Did you know that no cats were in any of those films? I think it should be a requirement that every film created has at least one cat in it. Space cats. Meow.
Totally agreed. Would have made the universe richer, and cuter in a way that Ewoks never could
"not committing crimes while being not as rich as advertised"
Too late for that. Can’t wait for the fire sale.
It's only a crime if you're stupid. Clearly he's too smart to get caught and convicted.
There is no bail in this case. It's a monetary judgement that he is appealing and in order to do so, he has to put the money in an escrow account or have a bond company front that money.
He hasn't found a bond company stupid enough to do so, and he doesn't have the cash on hand to do it, so the state will get to seize and sell off his assets until they get to the amount he owes.
I know this is over simplified, but hopefully clears up OPs confusion about bail and jail being in an equation where they don't belong.
This isn't bail. This is a judgement against him that he is required to pay. What he wants to do is appeal the judgement, but to appeal he has to put up the money first. It's like in My Cousin Vinny where Vinny refused to kick that guy's ass until he had the $200, and the guy tried to pretend a roll of singles was the full amount.
Trump needs to show the government he has the money before he can appeal the ruling. If he can't, they can begine seizing his assets and selling them until the debt is paid. .