12
submitted 8 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It is not preferential. At the and of the day just one member is elected, sometimes with only 50.1% approval from the voters. The preferences of the other 49.9% are ignored. The Senate is preferential because a cohort of voters is electing multiple members. The votes are tallied and handed out by preferences. Say there are five seats. Labor gets 60% and Liberals get 40%, so it’s 3 seats for Labor and 2 for the Liberals. Everyone’s preferences were considered.

The non-electorate seats in NZ work the same way, using a national tally to hand out those seats by preference.

Instant-runoff is just a way of having a bunch of first past the post elections in one go. “If this candidate was eliminated, who would you vote for? Okay, but if that candidate was eliminated, who would you vote for?”. That’s how non-instant runoff elections work too. Until eventually you’re left with two people standing and one has more overall support.

Edit: As well if someone gets more than 50% first preferences they just win outright. Just because we use the word preference to describe that doesn’t make it preferential voting. It needs to represent the vote of all people.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are you considering preferential with proportional? Preferential means you order your preferences. No more, no less. A proportional system (of which STV is a quasi-member, being somewhat proportional, but not quite as purely proportional as most other proportional systems) is one where people's overall wishes are better taken into account, and the resulting parliament is a better representation of the will of voters.

Instant-runoff is just a way of having a bunch of first past the post elections in one go

Eh, sort of. It's a way of doing a runoff voting system all in one go. It's like the system parliamentary parties use to choose their leader, where they do one vote, eliminate the last place candidate, and then do another vote, and repeat. It's not really FPTP because the highest-scoring candidate in each round isn't what's relevant, the lowest-scoring is.

But I think we both understand how the elections work from a mechanical standpoint. You're just not clear on the correct terminology to refer to them.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
12 points (65.0% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
69 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS