357
Jim Jordan Gets Flustered As Simple Question Turns Awkward On '60 Minutes'
(www.huffpost.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
357 points (97.6% liked)
politics
19107 readers
2722 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This only works in situations where they cannot run back to the cult for overwhelming reinforcement .
In rural red areas most MAGAs have their heads so far up each other's asses that a breath of honest truth would kill them.
No, it still works.
The county I grew up in voted 95% trump the last two elections... I know how they think, I had to grow up with them.
And you're seeing these communities trend away from Trump? Otherwise no matter how you interact with them individually, they're still a net drag on the rest of America.
They love progressive policies tho, that's how Obama won multiple red states in 08 out of nowhere.
They dont love neoliberals who act like Republicans without the hate.
That's what the DNC doesnt get. These voters like the hate, not Republican policy.
So Dems adopting Republican policy accomplishes nothing but depressing their own voters turnout and helping Republicans normalize their shitty policies.
What do you think needs to happen for them to stop being attracted to the hate?
I've seen a similar thing: rural people talking about all sorts of progressive ideas like UBI, student debt relief, and other policies for helping others (sometimes without even knowing that they're talking about progressive ideas) yet always go back to "immigrants this" or "elites that".
Dems can offer a better alternative by simply leading by example. Stop leaning ever rightward and chasing the republicans to the bottom of the barrel. Progressive policies will work to win over hate-addled republicans because these policies will immediately and materially improve those people’s lives. If it affects them personally, republican voters will finally “get it.” When the republicans then argue that these policies need to be taken away, the voter sentiment will turn sour quickly.
We'll never be able to out hate republican politicians, trying only alienates Dem voters.
But it's not impossible to reach them, when Manchin acts too much like a fool, Bernie and I think AOC too go down to WV and explain what Manchin is blocking, then Manchin's voters get him to switch.
Like, reaching them ain't an impossible task no one's figured out, the rub is without the hate, you have to be serious about helping them. Republican politicians lie about the help, but honest about the hate.
Dems need to be honest about the help and they'll win all types of red states. It's just neoliberals addicted to do or money aren't gonna be able to be honest about helping.
We all watched Obama do it in 08, but the DNC just isn't willing to help Americans if it hurts their donor money.
So we run candidates voters don't want and vote for them anyway, which just makes the DNC act up even more next cycle.
The current system isn't working, it's going to break soon. We can take it down in a controlled manner or wait for it to blow up and catch us off guard.
Well, now that we've finally figured out what Obama is doing wrong, we should tell him!
Oh wait, he's not the President and we're not doing that anymore.