99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
99 points (83.7% liked)
PC Gaming
8568 readers
347 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So you've totally changed your tone, why would you have commented what you did instead of saying 'valid opion, I'm sure they'll choose to do whatever they want based on public sentiment so you expressing your opion is a totally normal and acceptable thing to do'?
You seem to want only people who agree with you to express their opinion, I'm not shocked of course that's how censorship lovers slways think.
You attack other people personally because you don't have answers to or understanding of the actual content of others' posts and comments.
You live in extremes and paint primarily with the "always" paint brush.
You react emotionally and defensively regardless of the context. The only tool in your toolbox is self-righteous anger outside of objective reality.
You consistently use your comments to try and shame other people for having thoughts and beliefs that they never said they have.
You feel that all of your anger and hatred is justified because you're fighting for what's right. In reality your ethics are surface level, reactionary, and formed from memes.
You paint people as having unethical viewpoints despite their having never inferred as much. You do this to feel justified in being ride and cruel to them as this is how you feel most comfortable expressing yourself.
You make connections and assumptions outside of evidence, context, or fact. It was no surprise to see that you're heavily in to conspiracy theories.
When you're called out for an illogical or nonfactual comment, you double down on your own ignorance instead of admitting fault or simply changing your view.
You believe that invoking the word "Wikipedia" is the same thing as citing a legitimate and relevant source.
Your lack of self-awareness is evident as you still haven't looked back through your comment history and felt enough shame to decide not to be that person anymore.
You speak with the experience, surety, and understanding of a child screaming at their parent that "it's haf to, not have to!!". I hope this is due to youth and immaturity and isn't a more permanent condition.
Also, you're blocked now.
The first paragraph of this is brilliant projection.
You've also made up a lot of weird lies and confusion simply to get around the fact that your assertion that only governments can do censorship is wrong and all this to defend a totally meaningless point because my argument is still 100% as valid if we use a more cumbersome word or phrase instead of censorship.
Seriously read your own comment history and work on your issues.
Oh and anyone interested in how deceptive he's being in this rant, his statement about me being into conspiracies is from a post talking about knowledge fight and the absurdity of conspiracy theories. This is not someone that even understands the concept of arguing in good faith.