622
Finally, an answer! (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/mst3k@lemmy.world

(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks. Comments above yours are a bit disingenuous, trying to bunch up intrusive lab techniques with selective breeding. While the definition of GMO is pretty vague, let's not pretend what Monsanto does is exactly the same as what Native Americans did.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

It's not. It's more advanced, and yes, it's better.

You know, more technology becomes available, you use it to make life better for everyone. Monsanto execta can go pound dicks, but in principle, GMO food is perfectly fine, safe, and healthy. If anything, it'll be more healthy (more vitamins), more plentiful as new crops can withstand droughts better, etc. etc. etc.

So far the only counter argument to that that I've heard here is "nuh uh!"

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
622 points (97.3% liked)

MST3K

918 readers
22 users here now

Rules/guidelines/info

You know you want links, baby!

This community is hosted at https://lemmy.world/c/mst3k and moderated by:

If you were a mod on /r/MST3K give me a shout.

Confused about Lemmy/Fediverse? Here's a useful infographic

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS