668
submitted 8 months ago by GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I don't think people on this sub use it, but it's great news for us. The worse it gets the likelier people move on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago

This. Open source apps are generally awful at presenting themselves to a broader audience.

Even for me, who's technical enough, an app being FOSS is not enough to even bother checking out. Yes, I've said it. Sorry, tinfoils, but I do put features above else. And, want it or not, general public does the same: if the featureset is not clear enough at first glance, and an app doesn't explicitly provide clarity on what it does and how it is better than competition, most people aren't even checking it out.

[-] atoro@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 months ago

It's an unpopular opinion but I completely agree. I've tried Matrix, not only could I not get more than 2% of my community to try it, but it's horribly unintuitive and limited for server owners. Shut it down after a few months.

I have a rocket chat server going now, some similar issues, but at least it has more control than Matrix. Still only a fraction of my Discord and Telegram user base has joined, but it's similar enough that people are at least willing to try.

FOSS alone is not enough, the wider public doesn't care, they just want something easy and convenient.

[-] jg1i@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Curious, what didn't you like about Matrix specifically? I'm in the process of evaluating it for my friends. With the Element client, so far it seems pretty dang similar? Space = server, room = channel, there are also access controls. Seems like there's voice and video chats too.

[-] atoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Speed was a big thing. Switching channels could take a few seconds to over a minute to load, on good hardware.

The biggest issue, and a huge glaring oversight imo, is that users can create their own channels, encrypt them, and instance owners have no way to know what goes on in there. Some of the channel names alone were enough to make your skin crawl.

Oh, and you want to ban somebody? Cool, just ban them individually from every channel, because there is no global instance-wide ban. Moderation is horrendous.

[-] iegod@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

That sounds laughable. Gross. No thanks.

[-] ninchuka@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago

did you host your own matrix homeserver or use matrix.org? that can change how fast it feels massively and yeah built in moderation tools are pretty much nonexistant https://github.com/the-draupnir-project/Draupnir is the only moderation bot that you can run to ban users from all rooms at once if they break your rules and lets you subscribe to banlists so if a user spams in other rooms that have write access and gets added they'll be banned from your rooms as well

[-] atoro@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Hosted my own, was basically trying to move a large group off telegram and onto my own servers.

I did use Mjolnir for a while, but that was a hassle in and of itself as well. Nothing was intuitive.

[-] zarenki@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

if the featureset is not clear enough at first glance

My experience as someone who has barely dabbled in Matrix, tried comparing clients, and knows a lot of people who stick to Discord: a lot of Discord users heavily use custom emotes, voice chat, and screen sharing. It's not even easy to figure out which Matrix clients support each of those features without installing everything and trying it out. There's a clients comparison on matrix.org that mentions Voip but not stickers or video.

For stickers alone:

  • Element is widely considered the go-to Matrix client but uses a strange integration system for predefined sticker packs instead of the MSC2545 stickers that more closely resemble what users coming from Discord would want.
  • Cinny seems to have the best support for stickers/emotes but its site doesn't mention them at all. It supports uploading and managing sticker packs at either a channel or user level, provides a nice picker UI to send any picture from those packs as either a large "sticker" or a small inline "emoji", and allows using them for reactions.
  • FluffyChat mentions stickers on its site and has the second best sticker support, with all of those except reactions and a graphical sticker picker for inline emoji (need to type them as shortcode).
  • SchildiChat, Nheko, and NeoChat have some sort of limited support for custom stickers/emoji. NeoChat is the only one of those that advertises stickers on its main site. Nheko mentions them in a GitHub readme.

Being able to freely use custom emotes without paying for a Discord Nitro subscription nor server boosts would be a great selling point but it's not something most users would be able to figure out before signing up. The limited client support isn't great; e.g. Fluffy is the only Android client that supports sending custom stickers but some people may dislike the chat bubbles style UI.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee -4 points 8 months ago

We need to fix people. This proprietary shit is dystopian.

Make the apps pretty, sure, but long term; fix people.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
668 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
386 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS