78
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

This is simplistic to the point of being misleading.

First, your income alone doesn't matter. What matters is income relative to the cost of living in your particular location. You can try to estimate "real" income at the state level, though even within each state there can be significant variation by region.

Second, how do you define "comfortable?"

[-] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

they define it in the paper, its not having to use more than 50% of your income for housing.

[-] Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Right? I'm close to half that for a household income and we take multiple vacations every year, everyone is well fed and happy, and we can afford birthday/Xmas presents for the kids and all nibblings.

Plus we're putting away a grand or two per month.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Agree, it's wildly simplistic. The variation in the cost of living is huge, even within pretty much extra state. In Modoc county, California, the median home price is $230k. I'm Santa Clara county it's $1.5m. Taking an average across the country is useless unless you just want to show very gross change from one year to another, and even that might mask changes in different directions in different areas.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
78 points (92.4% liked)

We already live in a dystopia.

517 readers
21 users here now

A community for chronicling how Advanced Capitalist Society is not only dystopic, but also incredibly boring.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS