572
submitted 7 months ago by essell@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Humans are just flesh computers, but LLMs are just guessing what a human would say, not coming up with something new. AI art is the same way.

Once AI can think for itself, legitimately, I think AI art can be considered art, and that's a long way away.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, in particular, Generative AI does not yet perceive reality for itself. It does not yet live a life. It does not go through hardships. It doesn't have stories to tell that it itself experienced.

It's able to regurgitate and remix stories that were meaningful at some point, and superficially one might not even be able to tell the difference, but if you want to hear a genuinely meaningful story, there's no way yet around sourcing it from a human.

Generative AI is able to create pretty/entertaining artworks, but no expressive art.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
572 points (83.6% liked)

Memes

45656 readers
1135 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS