70
Is RAID still needed? (programming.dev)

Me and my friend were discussing this the other day about how he said RAID is no longer needed. He said it was due to how big SSDs have gotten and that apparently you can replace sectors within them if a problem occurs which is why having an array is not needed.

I replied with the fact that arrays allow for redundancy that create a faster uptime if there are issues and drive needs to be replaced. And depending on what you are doing, that is more valuable than just doing the new thing. Especially because RAID allows redundancy that can replicate lost data if needed depending on the configuration.

What do you all think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Raid56 is a risky one in more filesystem than just btrfd though, but if you have a ups as backup, you should be fine.

[-] winnie@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

UPS won't protect from Kernel Panic, sadly

[-] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago
[-] winnie@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

What about dm-raid? Is it still risky? I guess so, because it's separate devices. So any software raid with 5-6 would be problematic?

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43885 readers
835 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS