12
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nothingcorporate@lemmy.world to c/socialism@lemmy.ml

Hi comrades, I'm new here, how do we feel about posting Mastodon content on Lemmy?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steve@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Most of this wealth is in stocks, though. Their worth is based on the number of shares they own of these companies. For every share they sell the value of the other shares drops a bit. So if Musk or Bezos sold all their shares, to have this money in actual cash, not only would they probably bankrupt their company and crash the stock market, but the cash they got out of it would be only a fraction of what this shows on paper now.

[-] Steve@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure how to edit comments so I’m adding this… I agree with the sentiment and how insanely low the minimum wage is. But these billionaires don’t actually have the amount of money most people believe they have. Functionally, it’s nowhere close.

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

But these billionaires don’t actually have the amount of money most people believe they have. Functionally, it’s nowhere close.

What do you mean by this?

[-] Steve@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

If you have $10 billion is STOCKS (which is what ALL of these billionaires have, NOT cash)… then even if you sell your stocks you’ll end up with WAY less because of how the stock market works. Also taxes.

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Let's say you only get 10% of the value, which is a massive stretch. What's 10% of $10 billion? $1 billion. That is still an absolutely insane amount of wealth.

The point "they don't have as much as you think" is meaningless, because the amount they do have is still exceptional. There's no functional difference past a certain threshold.

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

5189 readers
156 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS