780
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A distinguished group of retired four-star generals and admirals from the U.S. military have argued in a brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday that Donald Trump’s claims of absolute “presidential immunity” from criminal prosecution tied to Jan. 6 is an “assault” on the “foundational commitments” underpinning democracy and if his argument is allowed to succeed before them later this month, it threatens “to subvert the careful balance between the executive and legislative branches struck in the Constitution.”

The 38-page amicus brief features 19 authors, all of them decorated retired admirals, generals or secretaries from branches of the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force respectively. On April 25, the high court is poised to hear Trump’s question of immunity against prosecution for his alleged criminal conspiracy to subvert the results of the 2020 election. and according to the brief, these are arguments that should be approached with extreme caution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I get what you are saying but keep in mind that he has been losing his ability to stay composed for awhile now and it seems to be gaining speed. He is sundowning as we watch. I doubt he will be mentally capable of campaigning in a few months. He literally just told the world that Biden took a shit in the oval office, just when you think he can't get more unhinged, he proves you wrong.

I'm not sure where to find it now but some clinical psychologists or psychiatrists (iirc) gave a pretty decent breakdown of how trump is breaking down mentally.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

He told people Biden soiled itz and they laughed and clapped.

I see no evidence this is a problem for him. His lack of cognition, morals, etc has never really been a problem before.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 7 months ago

It's exactly on brand for him and his followers.

Hillary Clinton was right when she said half his supporters were a basket of deplorables. Those that got upset about that put themselves into that group.

They love him because of the unhinged shit he says. He takes the hate that the ~~two minutes hate~~ Fox News cultivates and brings it to the White House and that's exactly what they want.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

She was actually off by 50%.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

If anything, Hillary was being too kind.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Biden soiled

It is ALWAYS projection, always. Numerous people have said the orange liar soiled himself regularly.

[-] vinylshrapnel@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 7 months ago

Biden took a shit on the oval office

Sounds like one of those projection accusation confessions.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

That's likely exactly what it is.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Either that, or his nannies told him the presidential diapers are Oval Office brand.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

All he needs to do is be able to stand up come election day, then they can just weekend at Bernies for the next 4 years.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

This should be a joke but with the gullibility of his most devoted followers and how far computer generated images and video have come, this is a real possibility.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is 100% copium. The only thing that matters is actually convicting him and carrying out the criminal sentence. Until then, all this speculative BS is nothing but a distraction to provide cover for how badly all the leaders who aren't already outright traitors are fucking this up.

[-] griD@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

some clinical psychologists or psychiatrists (iirc) gave a pretty decent breakdown of how trump is breaking down mentally.

this one here?

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

That looks like it.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

When did he say Biden took a shit in the Oval Office? Lol

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Looks like either Sunday or Monday.

https://www.news18.com/world/donald-trump-claims-biden-soiled-white-houses-historic-resolute-desk-used-by-almost-all-presidents-8844011.html

I maintain that this is Defunded Donnie's way of admitting he had a diaper accident in the oval office

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Every accusation is a confession. That's the Republican way.

So how long before we hear about Trump having done it?

Or watch him drop a turd while campaigning?

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Let's not go there. I don't want to see news stories of maggats shitting on cars because they had Biden or Bernie stickers or any others supporting sane and intelligent things.

[-] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I actually think the comment could be interpreted as Trump shit on the desk before leaving either to spite Biden (instead of leaving the traditional letter), or his declining mind allowed him to let slip an accident he himself had personally, and that "'disgusting Biden' is still using it, what a weirdo, I wouldn't use it after I soiled it".

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It's the cult plus some normies voting against Biden. Don't underestimate how little they give a shit. We thought it ended with grab em by the sexual assault parts.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

I thought for sure it would end when he shit all over McCain for being a POW.

Never let a Trump voter tell you they are pro military. Ever.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

They hate veterans so much. They treat them like future unhoused mentally ill and guide them down the path.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
780 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3373 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS