this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
156 points (98.8% liked)
Space
8669 readers
29 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I got a similar photo, but not with a reflector. My image is the reverse of yours. :-)
I missed the correct exposure during C2, but was able to get it around C3 as totality ended. Maybe that's why it's the reverse. I wasn't using a reflector though, not sure where/how that'd be used.
I suspect they're saying a reflector telescope, or other telescope arrangement, that flips the image. I'm also a bit confused because while I also immediately assumed you had a flipped image, others are agreeing it was a 5 o'clock dot. My images (with a standard camera and lens) and memory (eyeballs and binoculars) put the dot at the 7. My post-totality beads are also to the left rather than right.
But still, your image is amazingly crisp. I jealous I spent time making fuzzier images. Best one I've seen here yet, short of observatory equipment. I had a crop dslr with a 70-200 f/4
Honestly I remember it being at 7 o'clock too but I think it might've just been that my camera was rotated a bit weird because it was mounted to a star tracker. I was really happy with how crisp it came out. I used a longer lens (this photo was at 400mm) and also made sure to use f8 as that's been noted to be the sharpest aperture for my lens. Beyond that I had focused on the sun using the sun spots and then didn't change the focus at all. I also had a remote trigger so I wouldn't shake the camera while taking the image. Also for this image I brought down the highlights which helped cut down on the blooming around the brightest features and helped them look more defined. I am very happy I was able to get this result because this was the first time I've tried shooting an eclipse and really wasn't sure if I was doing it right.
Interesting. I was wondering if mine was rotated on the eq mount but then I remember all the menus were right side up lol. I was also in VT, just south of Burlington. We're you north of there? I suppose we all saw the beads at different points depending on how far south or north from the centerline we were. It's weird to think about how a tangible distance on earth can make a noticeable affect on celestial objects. And I guess these prominences were so "small" that the exact ones you saw changed throughout the 3.5 minutes. If you weren't north... I don't know then. But, alas, I submit my best shot from totality and the best version of the beads I got from the end. Maybe I was rotated too with my rotating screen and remote shutter. So here's why I'm so impressed with your shot and disappointed I didn't even ask to borrow a 300-600 from a birder who stayed home!
I was like 30-40 min north of Burlington so maybe that is what made the difference? And those shots look awesome dude! I get the beads came out a little fuzzy but the totality shot looks great! Especially for being at 200mm. You could always use this at motivation to start planning a Spain trip for the one in 2 years haha
Thank you. I think next time, I might just watch with binoculars and record video with a cell phone for the affect on the area. Unless I manage to get a significantly better lens/telescope. But I'll probably get the itch anyway, knowing from this post that everyone sees different beads
Yeah actually just looking around the way the light changed and that weird darkness with light all around you in the distance was really cool
The orientation of the sun and moon relative to the horizon actually depend on your latitude. Think of it in the extremes: Teo peoplee standing on the North and South Poles see the sky upside down relative to each other.
That makes sense. However, both of us identified the same city and everyone at this event was in the same hemisphere. So all the same moon orientation, but the approach/departure angles were entirely different across just a narrow band. 100 miles or something.