Kurtzman has actively said he’s trying to get Legacy done but that he cannot snap his fingers and make it happen because Paramount exists.

But that's my point. Kurtzman is not the one greenlighting these shows. That's not in his power. He can want to make Legacy more than anything in the world, but Paramount is the one that gets to say which show gets made. And maybe even Kurtzman suggested, "let's do a Starfleet Academy show." But him suggesting it is not the reason it was greenlit.

But you’ve been phrasing this like even the concept of appealing to a different demographic is bad.

As I said, my issue is that this, right now, looks like it will be the only Star Trek show left after SNW is over (and I doubt it will last more than five seasons either), which I maintain is a terrible idea, specifically because it is intended to appeal to a specific demographic. Animated shows aside, Star Trek has never been created with the intention to appeal to a specific demographic. It has always been a show for everyone. Paramount is explicitly calling this a YA show.

A YA Star Trek show is just fine. I think it's great if it is a good show and introduces a new audience to it.

A YA Star Trek show being the only thing left is a terrible idea. And that is what is the case right now. Maybe Legacy will be greenlit and I will change my tune, but as it is right now, I will maintain that a YA Star Trek being the only Star Trek show left is a bad thing and is not what most current fans want.

Is it really a good idea to introduce a new audience a new audience to Star Trek at the expense of the current audience? Because I don't think it is.

And before you say it, I would definitely not say that Discovery would be the same sort of thing. Discovery was not sold as a show made to a specific audience.