20
Iran Breaches Anglo-Zionist Defenses in Historic Attack: A Breakdown
(simplicius76.substack.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)
GenZedong
4284 readers
15 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Personally i thought that was one of the weaker points in the article. I don't think that the "New Equation" is quite so balanced because while the Zionists would have no compunctions whatsoever about using nuclear weapons against Iran's civilians, i think that causing a nuclear disaster in occupied Palestine (or using nuclear weapons themselves which they could easily make if they ever wanted to) is just not something that Iran would ever do, for religious and moral reasons.
And i suspect that the US and the Zionists understand this and see it as a major weakness on Iran's part which lets the Zionists be confident in escalating knowing that they are prepared to go further than Iran ever would. In effect the neocolony is using the Palestinians as a human shield. And we have never seen the resistance axis be willing to be as ruthless as the Anglo-Zionists are, and perhaps that is not even a bad thing but it does mean that they have to rely on more asymmetrical means of retaliation.
That is a good point.
Perhaps Iran could find a middle ground between nukes and doing nothing of the sort, like destroying all power generation of the colonists next time sothing happens or even iradiating oil wells, or just holding the US responsible for the colonists attacks because if they are already sending missiles to one nuclear armed entity they might as well send to two.!?
Either way, this attack has shown that they can and will do something, but how much they are willing to do against the imperialists is indeed still an open question.