530

...replacing the previously hydraulic version.

Insert obligatory welcome statement here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

and a few thousand of these things come marching along.

You do understand how expensive and impractical that would be, right? Training a thousand 18-year olds to handle anti-material rifles is going to be far, far cheaper than doing maintenance on a hundred of these robots.

Or you’re protesting the party in power, so a few hundred of these automated

You don't need humanoid robots for that.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Also battery life, You can give a human a couple of sandwiches and they'll go all day, the robot probably needs a 20kg battery and still won't go more than 8 hours without charging. Its actually one of the kind of mindblowing things about organic systems, A whole human body runs on less power than just the control unit for one of these robots (assuming its similar to a mid range laptop) let alone the motors.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I have a very simple test for these things when it comes to military stuff - would this or that piece of tech have proved an obstacle to the NLF (you know... that organisation people insist on calling the "Viet Cong)?

And the answer for this robot is... only if the objective was to provide them with lots of fancy scrap metal.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Wait how many Kcal does a laptop burn a day?

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Its based on a rough calculation, a humans energy consumption averages to about a 126w supply, a mid range laptop uses about 150w. Admitedly a humans energy consumption is going to change a lot moment to moment but then so is the robots.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Hmm... well considering small sedentary adults need like around 1,200 to survive, then a mid range laptop seems like it would require 1,400.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Nah its based on a 2000kcal/day person, there's a still a lot of caveats sure like the person has to sleep but considering we're comparing to literally just the robots brain a human is way more efficient.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Expensive and impractical today, yes. But we would say the same of every man, woman, and child having a supercomputer with the entirety of human knowledge in their pocket fifty years ago.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
530 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3217 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS