415
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Tesla, the electric car company owned by Elon Musk, has recalled thousands of its new Cybertrucks over safety concerns. 

It is because their accelerator pedals currently risk getting trapped by the interior trim, increasing the possibility of crashes.

The BBC recently spoke to a whistleblower at the company who had raised concerns over the safety of pedals of previous Tesla models.

Tesla has been contacted for comment.

The recall affects 3,878 Cybertrucks, which cost roughly $61,000 (£48,320), made between November 2023 and April 2024. 

"A trapped accelerator pedal can cause the vehicle to accelerate unintentionally, increasing the risk of a crash," the US Department of Transportation wrote in a notification of the recall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Tesla still has advantages like an extensive charger network and the appearance of FSD on the horizon to general consumers. People that follow EV closely know there are better options, but they're a minority.

Not to mention the fact that places like Lemmy give the company and its CEO never-ending free press and coverage.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

appearance of FSD on the horizon

It's been on the horizon for the last 7 years or so.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Thus why I specifically said appearance and also mentioned it was for the uninformed.

I don't believe FSD is anywhere close to commercially viable for Tesla.

Reality doesn't matter when you're selling an idea or image. Its really easy to get lost in our nerd bubble and think everyone else reads about this stuff every day.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I think fully self-driving cars are pretty much impossible unless all vehicles on the road are fsd, and reporting information to a single central network.

There's just too many interconnected variables that can cause cascading newton like chains of cause and effect. For example something as simple as a little bit of rain vs a moderate amount of rain has drastically different effects on the coefficient of friction of the tires and road.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I think fully self-driving cars are pretty much impossible unless all vehicles on the road are fsd, and reporting information to a single central network.

In other words, impossible forever because there are plenty of legitimate road users that will never be self-driving, such as bicycles.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

"legitimate road users" "such as bicycles"

Not recognized in America.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

such as bicycles.

eyes bike, webcam, raspberrypi, powerbank, and some actuators

Hold my beer.

On a more serious note, there are some prototype self driving e-bikes, and due to the lower speed and mass they are probably much safer than Tesla's murderbots.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

there are some prototype self driving e-bikes

I gotta admit, I've heard of those before, but they don't make any damn sense to me as anything but a novelty/experiment so I ignored them.

[-] capem@startrek.website 19 points 7 months ago

like an extensive charger network

To be fair, that "advantage" shouldn't even exist.

We shouldn't have different chargers for cars just like we don't have different gas stations.

[-] Hexarei@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

Thankfully lots of upcoming vehicles will be adopting the Tesla charging standard (it's better).

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Sure?

That doesn't affect reality though.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

People that follow EV closely know there are better options, but they're a minority.

I don't think they're a minority of people that have considered buying an EV and don't impulse spend tens of thousands of dollars on a vehicle though.

It doesn't matter to them if the person who wasn't going to buy an EV doesn't buy a Tesla. It matters if the person who was going to buy an EV doesn't buy a Tesla.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Its not an impulse spend, its a lengthy history of hearing that Teslas are THE option for EV.

Normies who have seen or heard of Teslas for well over a decade now aren't going to be easily swayed by an upstart company or the latest Nissan Leaf.

Elon's image after Twitter in my opinion has done way more to dissuade potential buyers than anything Tesla itself or other car manufacturers have done.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 7 months ago

I've talked to plenty of normies about this, from what I've seen whatever advantage Tesla had is pretty much gone between the stories of EVs burning down buildings, EV range anxiety, etc.

The "normies" just want a good car that's going to get them from point A to B ... and most "normies" shop around a bit before dropping 30, 40, or 50k on a car.

If they're buying Tesla it's because a friend they trust bought one and likes it. Most normies have way too many doubts about EVs and Tesla to really have brand loyalty.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

What EV cars are these normie friends of yours buying instead? As in actually purchased, not plan to purchase.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 7 months ago

My normie friends haven't bought any EV cars because they don't think they're ready and I'm inclined to agree really.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Then why do their opinions matter? They aren't in the market for any EV, as you said in an earlier post.

My normie friends with EV have bought teslas and I don't know anyone except EV nerds that have bought any other manufacturer since the first gen Leaf.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Let me try restarting this conversation because IMO it's off the rails of my point and has nothing to do with what "my friends" think.

Most people do not buy a new car without looking at options. When people do care, they'll ask Google what the best EVs are of XYZ year and go try some cars out. They're not going to "just go buy a Tesla because that's the name they've associated with EVs."

Most people are also not buying EVs at this point.

When this average people do care and they start seriously looking at buying an EV, "Tesla" having the brand Tesla is not going to help them very much, if at all.

Put differently, any advantage Tesla has exists with the average Joe because the average Joe don't have skin in the game. "Tesla" may have word association with "EV", but word association alone isn't enough to justify a 30, 40, 50, etc thousand dollar purchase.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know why you're so intent on giving this perspective when you don't know anyone actually following it.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
415 points (98.1% liked)

News

23361 readers
3210 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS