115
submitted 5 months ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Just for the record, nowhere did I argue for moving Botswanans out of their land.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Fair. But Botswana is facing a water crisis, so unless something is done there is going to be a conflict.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Yes. Which is why I'm arguing for the global north to subsidize the global south.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

That would be better than nothing, yes. And maybe Botswana will agree to that. But when you're hit with a drought, there's only so much money can do. Botswana is land-locked, and their neighbours (except South Africa to some extent) are also quite arid. Maybe they can eventually transition their economy to something that uses less water, but transitioning a national economy takes decades, and till then they're screwed.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
115 points (92.6% liked)

World News

32082 readers
837 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS