152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
152 points (90.9% liked)
Technology
59287 readers
4314 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Upscaled photos are essentially fiction that is based on actual events. Any details that are not clear in the original should not be treated as real.
For the sake of, say, improving the visual quality of a movie, this is fine.
For the sake of forensics...aw hellllll no. The first time a prosecutor tries to use AI-enhanced images in court, they'll be absolutely destroyed by a competent defense attorney, and possibly disbarred.
I feel like AI isnt ubiquitous enough for a lawyer using it improperly to be seen as acting in bad faith and disbarred. I don't know, but disbarring seems like a more "fatal" punishment.
You're probably right. I'm sure it would depend on specifics. An extreme case could be considered falsifying evidence, which I think could be grounds for disbarment. In practice it might just be a matter of providing the original photos and clearly presenting any edited images as such.