351
Immortality rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

by Centurii-chan

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago

I see no downside to living forever because if the heat death of the universe is truly the eternity I'm doomed to, then I'll eventually become so deprived of sensory input that there would be no difference between life and death.

[-] FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 33 points 7 months ago

I mean, true heat death would also imply that even your body is spent. No neurons will be able to fire. No brain activity. You won't be any different than dead.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 30 points 7 months ago

Thus, any "true" sort of immortality must necessarily violate the conservation of energy.

Therefore, we should investigate immortal entities as potential post-stellar-phase power sources.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Oooh, brand new man made horror beyond my comprehension: immortality as an endless torment, being perpetually harvested as a resource.

Actually, I think Made In Abyss touched on that a bit in its second season

load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

196

16508 readers
2321 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS