223
submitted 8 months ago by Type1@midwest.social to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] galoisghost@aussie.zone 9 points 8 months ago

Given these people have nowhere to go why not set aside some public land that allows long term encampments or maybe if it’s a concern about the safety of these encampments, the government could acquire an empty office building and retrofit it with modest accommodations for these peoples.

Or you could just admit it’s not about helping these people it’s about making them go away.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

Those are both reasonable solutions and I'm not arguing against them. I just pointed out that this fight isn't about banning homeless people from sleeping outside. It's more nuanced than that.

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
223 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2003 readers
1162 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS