this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
223 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2794 readers
1679 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 134 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can't afford a home, probably gonna be illegal to be homeless. Guess they should just kill themselves then.

Fuck the modern conservative movement. No empathy for the downtrodden.

[–] johsny@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is illegal to kill yourself.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Born too early to enjoy fully automated luxury gay space communism, born too late to participate in affordable housing, born just in time to go to jail for conspiracy to commit suicide because living is too expensive.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Canada has entered the chat.

[–] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Guess they'll just rot in prison, then

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The next step is blending them into a nutrient-rich slush that will be fed to people in workhouses

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Too much pork fat to be healthy

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That’s a very Soylent remark…

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't think this is just about conservatives, it's also about the owner class and their quality of life. But def significant overlap.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/us-homeless-encampments-companies-profiting-sweeps

Revealed: how companies made $100m clearing California homeless camps Public spending on private sweep contractors is soaring across the state – and unhoused people allege poor treatment

This reminds of the gross, despicable private detention and private prison industry in America.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They're connected. How many times can you get detained overnight and have your entire life belongings destroyed before you fight the police officer detaining you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would these people rather homeless people break into places and sleeping inside? This seems like the only plausible alternative.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they would. Homeless people aren’t criminals and they can’t make being homeless a crime, per se, so they just do as much as they can to drive them towards crimes. It’ll be safer to avoid being caught if they break in and can be hidden but if they do get caught it’ll be horrendous. They’ll put them in slave camps-I’m sorry, “jails” and away we go.

It is the most heinous shit imaginable and these broken monsters get off to it.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago

I mean vagrancy is increasingly being criminalized directly.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Watch closely as they make providing shelter illegal as well (just like they made providing food illegal). The cruelty is the point.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great idea.

Of course, if it's a crime to be homeless, it's also a crime to force or coerce someone into commiting that crime.

I look forward to the officials and landlords responsible to be jailed for each crime they helped commit.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

"No, not like that!"

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 year ago

That's right homeless, you can't sleep here. Just go home already.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know this guy who goes to the New York state courthouse everyday to sleep. He doesn't even try to hide. He does it in an occupied court room during a trial, on tax-paid furniture.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the dude smells like SHIT.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

good, the judge deserves to smell some consequence.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As if we don't know how this Court will decide.

[–] rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I will say I'm somewhat optimistic about this case. Yes the current supreme court has a heavy partisan lean, but I've seen some decisions from the court which my pessimistic side didn't expect to go the way they did.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 31 points 1 year ago

"Let them sleep inside". paraphrasing Marie Antoinette. smh.

[–] nomnomdeplume@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Where do we put them if every city, every village, every town lacks compassion and passes a law identical to this

This is why there needs to be a national effort around this, rather than this patchwork approach which often just (expensively&wastefully) moves the problem around without solving it.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

How's that old quote go again? "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago

This is probably the most prescient episode of Star Trek ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_Tense_(Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine)

Basically Sisko and friends go back in time to America in 2024, where it's illegal to be homeless and they get put in an open air prison.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems like a no-brainer to me... though it probably isn't. Obviously you have a constitutional right to sleep, wherever you can make space for yourself. If these cities and downs don't want people sleeping outside, they need to provide indoor space for people who haven't actually committed crimes. We treat our criminals better than we treat our homeless.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

fuck their laws, I think, is the ruling here. just fuck them completely. we do not have a society. your conscience is the only guide.

[–] HeChomk@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something something, sanctuary districts, something something, Bell Riots. Almost on schedule. WW3 next, then first contact.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, due to a budget restriction, first contact has been canceled. Please accept our apology in the form of nuclear winter.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Belk Riots - September 2024

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bell.

But yes this seems exactly like the precursor to the Bell Riots...

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had to look it up, Jesus that's a bit too on the nose.

Alright, I need to finally watch Star Trek through and through.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They really love pushing buttons dont they

load more comments
view more: next ›