1032
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

A house is a much safer asset than the S&P. Generally if you have enough wealth you have a mix.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Not necessarily, it's subject to a lot more geographic risk. If you have a properly diversified real estate portfolio (i.e. properties in a variety of geographic locations), sure, it can be less risky, but at that point you're so rich that even wild variation in returns isn't going to impact your retirement.

Your average landlord holding a small basket of priorities likely hasn't properly diversified. It's akin to buying a handful of blue chips, you're trading returns for consistency, but even blue chips fail (see GE) and sectors collapse. So if you're buying properties near you and your local economy tanks, you're kinda screwed. If you diversify, your maintenance overhead will jump and your margins will fall.

There's certainly money to be made, but for real estate it's usually at scale, and I'm not going to have enough money to make scaling realistic (nor do I want that much money anyway).

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
1032 points (81.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9773 readers
1631 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS