190
submitted 1 year ago by MJBrune@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

I love hearing about unique takes on game mechanics. Someone recently convinced me that limited inventories are kind of abused currently and that unlimited inventory systems would give more player choices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bear@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

I strongly dislike ingame teleporting and pause menu quick travel. I'd much rather the game have more ways for me to get to where I'm going than simply materializing wherever I want to be.

Let the travel itself be part of the game instead of just a way to link the "real" parts of the game together. Make it fun and fast to move around, add unlockable shortcuts, add more in-universe traveling options. Let me get to where I'm going myself instead of doing it for me, and make it fun to do so.

Especially in open world games, not only is this the most true, but they're the worst offenders. Literally what is the point of making an open world and then letting people skip it? You see everything once and that's it. If you make an open world full of opportunities to wander and explore, and then players want to avoid it as much as possible via teleportation, you have failed as a designer.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Time is limited. I don’t want to spend 30 minutes traveling from one side of a map to the next if I’ve already done that 15 times. Just let me get there immediately so I can talk to this single person and get this item I will never use.

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I'm honestly fine with traveling if it's interesting. That's what I disliked most about red dead 2 was even with the beautiful landscape and soundtrack and the random encounters, pretty much every one of your 50 trips to [insert nearby settlement] within a given chapter are going to be exactly the same, and you can't go very fast because you're on a horse.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I’m pretty sure Death Stranding didn’t have fast travel, and I think it worked quite well there. Part of the challenge is to learn the best route between the stations, so it’s well incorporated into the gameplay. There’s barely any enemies on your way either, and those that exist are easily avoidable.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Traveling in Death Stranding is the game though. Enemies are only one part of the challenge; there's also terrain and how much cargo you can carry on the way, even if you've taken that route before.

[-] platysalty@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Death Stranding is Kojima attempting to sell out by making a walking simulator and accidentally putting too much work into it.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I found Death Stranding to be a game that, even though it has combat in it, it's a solid demonstration of how many different types of mechanics we could be building a game around besides combat, even with a story and high production value.

[-] platysalty@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I would go as far as to say that the combat is the weakest part of the gameplay. I did not enjoy the boss battles and had to turn down the difficulty for them.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I guess the combat was the weakest part, but it composes such a small part of the game that it made plenty of sense. From that perspective, I found it weird that it had any boss battles at all.

[-] platysalty@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Those combat arenas made no sense at all.

If we're talking about those environmental bosses, I'm down for those cause running away without falling down is sort of core gameplay.

But damn, I did not ask to have to play mandatory Call if Duty

[-] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Enjoyed the traveling in Ghost of tsushima. Never felt like a choir there

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t want to spend 30 minutes traveling from one side of a map to the next

I'm not talking 30 minutes. There should be options that let the player do it in a few, depending on the scale.

Just let me get there immediately so I can talk to this single person and get this item I will never use.

You're encouraging bad design in order to facilitate bad content. There also shouldn't be much if any mailman content either, that's just filler.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Or just let me call them on a call phone.

[-] smoof@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

How do you incorporate phones in Skyrim?

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

They never said Skyrim.

Age of Wushu needed less teleport slots.

[-] Addfwyn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I am really conflicted on this, and I think there needs to be some balance or cost/reward. I mostly agree though.

An example I often use about this is in MMOs. WoW felt like a huge world, especially back in vanilla. You could fly end to end and never hit a loading screen, it felt awesome. If you gave me a map of Azeroth and asked me to label all the zones, I probably could. It's moved a bit more to people teleporting place to place, but I still can fly end to end of a continent.

On the other hand, FFXIV is a series of maps with loading zones between all of them (a necessity because of the older console architecture, I understand) and teleports in every town. You never actually go end to end of Eorzea. If you gave me a map of Eorzea and asked me to label only the three majors cities on it, I doubt I could. It is definitely convenient to just be able to warp around place to place for a trivial amount of currency.

It takes a lot out of the feeling of "world" to just have a bunch of arbitrary areas, I admit. It's a tough balancing act between player convenience and player immersion.

[-] Nipah@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, FFXIV makes is super convenient to revisit a place once you've already been there via the aetheryte, meaning you're probably not going to visit it on foot more than a few times. This means you don't really make that connection between zones (or at least, I didn't) and thus don't really view it as an interconnected world (the loading areas between each zone doesn't really help).

I'm struggling to give proper credit to WoW because I'm not sure if its the staggering amount of time I played the game, the time of my life when I played the game (younger brain retaining knowledge better?), or the seamless transition between zones which lends it to sticking in my memory so hard as a 'real, interconnected world'... probably a combination of the three, if we're being honest.

[-] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think MMOs need fast travel because sometimes you just want to meet your friends in X dungeon and all the scenic travel is just an obstacle to that. There shouldn't be barriers to the social aspect of these games. MMOs have more than enough padding already, if people want the immersive experience they can choose to do that on their own.

[-] ImaginaryFox@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Games that give you rapid and fun ways to travel have been ones that I've actually not found tedious to get from point a to point b. Methods I've like have been blink (teleporting short distances), grapple hook, super speed, flying, etc.

But, just old fashioned running or driving gets stale fast.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
190 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30555 readers
90 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS