clearly the problem is none of these long-term open source package maintainers understand that open source means Anduril can use NixOS for whatever they like! and clearly that means we have to give them an outsized amount of direct and indirect control over our committees and board, accept their money even when our entire community and several partner organizations tell us not to, let their trolls take over our discussion forums, and set up several shady commercial deals between them and a company that controls a bunch of Nix’s supposedly community-owned infrastructure (which we’ll also insist they have the right to use, even when their commercial usage of it far outstrips the value of their contributions to the community (which, in any case, wants Anduril to fuck off))

yeah, that’s the problem here

ran a quick search on the repo to check something, rg -l 'maintainers = \[ \]'

can't paste the results here unfortunately (guessing post size or lemmy filtering or something). not a very scientific or comprehensive search but I just wanted a very quick look. couple of names in there that I can see that aren't great to not have maintainers on.

(note: a more thorough check would also have to check sub-team(?) expressions as well as recent git modifications on those expressions. however, I'm not going to even try do that before I've had some food, and maybe ordered some booze too)

every bone in my body wants to, but spinning up the infrastructure for a Nix fork would literally bankrupt me

I will definitely contribute what I can (including a reasonable monthly donation, expertise if needed, and any code improvements I haven’t contributed to nixpkgs) to any fork that fixes Nix’s structural and leadership issues to the satisfaction of the authors of the open letter

I can also promise to be a particularly persistent advocate for the fork, but that goes without saying