1138
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

i have no idea what this brand is supposed to be but... tbh i don't see anything wrong with the right one
logos are supposed to be simple-ish, use minimal amount of colors and be scalable and it sure does a better job with it's reduced color palette and vector shapes
the one on the left should be reserved for e.g. illustrations

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I kinda agree with it from an ease of printing perspective and easy perception from a distance, but they completely changed the proportions and got rid of the contrasting dark blue/red color-scheme that would catch people's eyes. Looking at them side by side I'm still not convinced they're even the same company, and that's a failure for brand recognition in my mind which is the only reason logos even exist.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1138 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

5375 readers
458 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS