view the rest of the comments
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
I did deny it. I cited an article denying it. You refuse to accept the truth and expect me to accept your delusion. I won’t. It’s that simple.
The truth: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uNXgjnBpxGI
False. Already cited otherwise.
You claim to want a discussion but really what you want is agreement with your false ideas.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
You ssnt to believe Trump made fun of a disabled person. It’s important for you to believe that. It bothers you that I look at the facts and don’t see the delusion. I just see Trump doing exactly what he’s done for years.
I find it more entertaining you see something that isn’t there and keep insisting it’s true.
He clearly mocked a disabled person. I’m not arguing that with you anymore. It’s in the video, clear as any other video. It’s your choice to pretend not to see it.
You’re just having to justify to yourself that isn’t what happened so you can’t be wrong.
Its reasons like this that explain perfectly why you get more dissent than agreement in this community. At least in past exchanges I’ve owned up when I was wrong and apologized. You so far have been incapable of that.
I would own up if I was wrong but as my citation shows, I am correct.
An opinion article on a conservative site is not making any points in your favor and the fact that you think that it’s enough to debunk a video of the thing actually happening is honestly really sad.
With as much as you like to trash talk liberals I would expect better debate skills from you. But I guess this is just how conservatives form arguments.
If I were to provide an opinion article from a liberal publication saying the exact opposite, would that then fully cancel out your point and put us back at square one? Or would you just continue denying the world around you?