13
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)
FreeAssembly
75 readers
1 users here now
this is FreeAssembly, a non-toxic design, programming, and art collective. post your share-alike (CC SA, GPL, BSD, or similar) projects here! collaboration is welcome, and mutual education is too.
in brief, this community is the awful.systems answer to Hacker News. read this article for a solid summary of why having a less toxic collaborative community is important from a technical standpoint in addition to a social one.
some posting guidelines apply in addition to the typical awful.systems stuff:
- all types of passion projects and contributions are welcome, including and especially those that aren't programming or engineering in nature
- this is an explicitly noncommercial, share-alike space
- don't force yourself to do work you don't enjoy, or demand it of others
(logo credit, with modifications by @dgerard@awful.systems)
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
I'm still waiting to hear about how Lix will achieve faster evaluation. I'm worried that they don't actually have such a plan, and are hoping that Rust will magically speed things up.
nah, there’s actually low-hanging fruit here, especially when it comes to flakes. my impression is that Rust is part of a much-needed effort to make the evaluator more maintainable (as CppNix is reputedly a bit of a shitshow on the inside), but the performance improvements will most likely involve a new version of flakes (and I believe a flake versioning scheme is on their short-term roadmap)
I guess. This doesn't really match my experience at all, though; in particular, Nix was slow to evaluate back when we all used
nix-env
, and I'm not sure why flakes would matter much to evaluation performance. It reminds me of Hugs; surely at some point we should invent a GHC instead.