236
submitted 6 months ago by clot27@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Here's what he said in a post on his telegram channel:

🤫 A story shared by Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter, uncovered that the current leaders of Signal, an allegedly “secure” messaging app, are activists used by the US state department for regime change abroad 🥷

🥸 The US government spent $3M to build Signal’s encryption, and today the exact same encryption is implemented in WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Google Messages and even Skype. It looks almost as if big tech in the US is not allowed to build its own encryption protocols that would be independent of government interference 🐕‍🦺

🕵️‍♂️ An alarming number of important people I’ve spoken to remarked that their “private” Signal messages had been exploited against them in US courts or media. But whenever somebody raises doubt about their encryption, Signal’s typical response is “we are open source so anyone can verify that everything is all right”. That, however, is a trick 🤡

🕵️‍♂️ Unlike Telegram, Signal doesn’t allow researchers to make sure that their GitHub code is the same code that is used in the Signal app run on users’ iPhones. Signal refused to add reproducible builds for iOS, closing a GitHub request from the community. And WhatsApp doesn’t even publish the code of its apps, so all their talk about “privacy” is an even more obvious circus trick 💤

🛡 Telegram is the only massively popular messaging service that allows everyone to make sure that all of its apps indeed use the same open source code that is published on Github. For the past ten years, Telegram Secret Chats have remained the only popular method of communication that is verifiably private 💪

Original post: https://t.me/durov/274

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If someone really care about privacy you can use Session instead. Good luck!!

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 months ago

Sarcasm ? An Australian company, with zero constitutional protection from a 5 eyes nation? It screams honey pot

[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

It's that or the CIA, your choice..

[-] dfense@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Try Threema... Open source, Swiss based, audited. As you and your data are not the product of this company, it costs 5 bucks. Less than a Starbucks coffee, but I still have a hard time convincing my peers to switch. (Not affiliated with Threema, just a fan)

[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Thx for the info mate 👍👍

[-] dfense@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

You are welcome!

[-] GroteStreet@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

With the 5 Eyes agreement, the they're one and the same.

[-] telep@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

session doesnt have perfect forward secrecy. they removed it from signals protocol to make it more easily compatible with their onion routing/crypto network. makes it one of the easiest apps to be "backdoored" if any keys were to be compromised.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
236 points (80.6% liked)

Privacy

31956 readers
460 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS