369
Steve Buscemi victim of random street attack in New York City
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
369 points (97.4% liked)
News
23311 readers
3587 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What exactly is this comment suggesting? It seems like a coward's way to call for violence using ambiguous but still incendiary language.
Violence has been committed and I hope the perpetrator is able to be caught and punished. Violence like this isn't okay.
In a general sense, I hope for more out of humanity's future and hope this kind of behavior is eventually selected out, both naturally and intentionally. (I'm currently reading a book about selection, which is where my mind was at when posting). Humans have come a long way in their thousands upon thousands of years of history. That's especially the case more recently. We have a long way to go though and we can do better now and today.
Catch the perpetrator, punish them (this is a loaded idea though), and–good fortune willing–rehabilitate and nurture something greater in them (which is the very best thing to do). Failing that, separate them from the rest of us so that further harm is mitigated. We don't need that shit. Our penal systems are broken and people don't get the help they always need, but we must continue trying to make things better for all of our sakes.
Yours Truly, The seeming coward ironically calling for non-violence
P. S. A simple "could you elaborate on what you mean" might have come across better.
Follow your own advice. Your language was needlessly loaded. I've seen plenty of comments like that that know exactly what they're doing.
"They" meant whoever the vague authority is when people often use they. I guess the NYPD in this case, but it's often hard to cheer for cops to do the right thing when I read the news these days. You can believe I meant something more, like vigilantes (I'm guessing?), but that isn't okay either. It's against my principles.
(Although I have to admit that I root for Batman in spite of my belief that vigilantism isn't the way. Too many ways for it to go wrong. The State often can't get it right itself and it's them we entrust.)
"Prune" wasn't a great choice of word I suppose. The intent to express a desire for this kind of behavior to be removed from the rest of us. There are a lot of ways to achieve that and I presume you think I meant violently, which is quite the opposite of what I would want. Again, strong principle of nonviolence.
English, and language in general, is a funny thing. I'm still getting the hang of it. I've edited my original comment to reflect my intent with different words.
What happened to Steve was not okay. It can't be tolerated. And I hope the authorities can somehow catch them and get them the help they need while protecting everyone else from this kind of violence. I've heard of these random attacks more often and it's not okay, it's not funny, and it needs to stop.