-16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
-16 points (21.4% liked)
Conservative
377 readers
49 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Do you mean this Alpha News? https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alpha-news/ Detailed Report
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Anti-Islam, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT Factual Reporting: LOW Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://abetterminnesota.org/2022/02/the-truth-about-alpha-news/
The one that has poor sourcing, conspiracy theories, an anti-Islamic slant, and a lack of transparency? Perhaps I've found information on a different Alpha News than the one you are referencing. Though that would an interesting coincidence, as this is apparently an article with an antij-Islamic stance.