121
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

Most of space is empty, analysis of the path beforehand and a structure that can withstand the smaller objects is really all that's necessary. But those are just as theoretical as this engine.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Problem is that asteroids are very hard to see, as they are both cold and dark, meaning they don't stand out against space very much at all. And even a micrometeoroid poses a risk even when traveling at low velocities (e.g. someone orbiting earth, the meteoroid itself has a relatively high velocity). Getting hit by a 1cm meteoroid at warp 1 would be devastating.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Yes, as I said theoretically. If/by the time this heavily theoretical engine comes to fruition there will probably be ways to detect asteroids better than we have now. Also materials/structural design that are better than what we have now for sustaining the smaller hits. Maybe quantum prediction scanning, maybe a forcefield. Who knows by then.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Not an issue if you aren't actually traversing the whole space but rather bending space to get you where you want to go.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Well, I'll be long dead before we get a Farnsworth drive running off dark matter.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
121 points (85.8% liked)

science

14594 readers
786 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS