485
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Considering that the AUR is a repo of build packages that are managed by users, it’s mostly unsafe because of that- not being in manjaro (which also uses pacman, and as far as I know just a different flavor.)

If you really want to use the AUR, you just have to turn it on. As with any package builds, it’s safe to use if you check the build and see what it does- and you need to be doing that in arch too. (Or not. Fun times.)

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

You aren't wrong about the aur. Similar could be said about flat packs snaps Etc however. We should always audit our systems regularly.

That said, Manjaro is different enough that even enabling the Aur is a bad idea. I know from experience as I've done several reinstalls Etc. Because of Manjaro issues with the aur. They really shouldn't even ship access to it. Because Manjaro does so many Breaking changes. It's one of many bad decisions on the part of Manjaros maintainers. Ubuntu may be Debian and based. But it's not Debian. Manjaro is the same.

The rest of them basically are Arch just with a few tweaks, themes, base install, and installer.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
485 points (97.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20705 readers
2523 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS